By Joleen Engela, Customer Success Manager, EMEA, and Tejas Katwala, Co-Founder, CLDigital
CIOs and Chief Risk Officers are carrying a structural cost burden that rarely shows up on a budget line but influences everything in risk, resilience, compliance, and technology operations. It is the architectural scaffolding beneath these programs: the integrations, data transformation pipelines, reporting layers, and consultant support required to keep everything stitched together.
For years, this has been accepted as normal. It is simply “how GRC works” or “what resilience requires.” But this architecture was built for an earlier era, when processes were slower, data volumes were smaller, and regulatory expectations were less dynamic. But this architecture reflects a period before fully dynamic, integrated platforms were available – when organizations were compelled to assemble complex, multi-discipline tooling to satisfy regulatory and operational requirements.
Today, it functions as an invisible tax that slows organizations down and drives up cost without delivering strategic value.
CLDigital eliminates that tax by collapsing the integration, data, and reporting layers into a unified, real-time resilience fabric.
The Legacy Architecture CIOs and CROs Have Inherited
Across industries, the same pattern has emerged.
Common components include:
- iPaaS platforms such as MuleSoft, Boomi, SnapLogic, Informatica, or custom-coded API layers
- Daily or weekly batch feeds that only partially update core records
- Large risk and resilience data lakes that absorb millions in cost but deliver stale data
- ETL pipelines that require specialized engineering or external consultants
- Reporting layers that fall out of sync with the operational view
- Manual handoffs that fill gaps when systems cannot communicate
-
IT ticket queues for even minor changes to fields, forms, and dependencies
Individually these investments are understandable. Together they create a model defined by high cost, slow updates, fragile dependencies, and heavy reliance on technical specialists.
Risk, resilience, and compliance teams end up working with outdated information.
IT teams end up maintaining an ecosystem that grows heavier with each release cycle.
Innovation slows because change becomes expensive, political, and hard to coordinate.
This is no longer sustainable.
The Hidden Tax That Quietly Erodes Budgets and Resilience
Most organizations spend more money maintaining the layers beneath their GRC and resilience platforms than they spend on the platforms themselves.
The consequences are significant.
- Data becomes stale, reducing the quality of insights
- Scenario testing and impact tolerance work rely on incomplete structures
- Regulatory reporting requires heroic effort instead of routine execution
- Change cycles slow down because updates must pass through multiple teams
- Manual interventions introduce risk, inconsistency, and operational overhead
-
Programs lose momentum because technology cannot adjust fast enough
This is not a problem of tooling. It is a problem of architecture and operating model.
The CLDigital Shift: Removing the Integration and ETL Layer Entirely
CLDigital replaces the multi-layered stack with a unified model that handles ingestion, transformation, relationships, workflows, reporting, and automation inside a single platform.
This is the structural breakthrough.
Flow replaces the separate iPaaS tier
Flow manages ingestion, transformation, validation, routing, enrichment, and orchestration within the core platform. Instead of pushing data through a secondary iPaaS system such as MuleSoft, Boomi, or similar tools, organizations can process and update information in real time, with full awareness of risk and resilience context.
Data Hub replaces the standalone data lake
CLDigital becomes the governed source of truth for services, processes, applications, suppliers, locations, controls, and every relationship between them. The need for a siloed lake or a complex ETL pipeline disappears. The data is always current, always connected, and always accessible.
BI replaces the reporting pipeline
Dashboards are built directly on the live operational data model. There is no extraction or transformation layer to maintain. When data changes, insights change. This creates true real-time awareness instead of daily or weekly snapshots.
Agentic automation replaces manual updates
CLDigital’s agents continuously update records, validate data, recalibrate thresholds, trigger workflows, synchronize dependencies, and prepare evidence. Human teams focus on judgment and strategy rather than administrative maintenance.
Why CIOs Care
CIOs finally gain an architecture that is modern, maintainable, and significantly leaner than the legacy approach.
The benefits are substantial.
- Fewer systems to maintain
- Fewer vendors to manage
- Fewer integration pipelines
- Reduced reliance on external consultants
- A major reduction in technical debt
- Faster delivery cycles and shorter backlogs
- A platform where the business can make changes without IT dependency
Gain efficiency and restore the velocity CIOs have been trying to reclaim for a decade.
Why Chief Risk Officers Care
Risk is a real-time discipline. It demands accuracy, speed, and connected visibility.
With CLDigital:
- Dependencies remain fresh instead of aging out
- Scenario work reflects the current enterprise architecture
- Impact tolerance decisions are based on live data
- Control evidence is always ready for auditors and regulators
- Third-party risk becomes more continuous
- Technology and business resilience become integrated instead of parallel
- Reporting becomes a natural output, not a special project
CROs gain actionable clarity instead of static reports.
The Result: An Entire Cost Tier Removed From the Operating Model
Organizations that adopt CLDigital are not simply adding a platform. They are eliminating an entire architectural layer that has consumed budget, time, and energy for two decades.
They remove:
- iPaaS complexity for risk and resilience use cases
- Batch feed delays
- ETL pipelines
- The standalone data lake requirement
- Dependency drift
- Reporting silos
- Manual reconciliation work
- Heavy consultant dependency
- Multi-team approval chains for simple changes
They gain:
- Cross-domain clarity
- A unified operational fabric
- Real-time resilience
- Automated dependency management
- A dramatically lower TCO
- A simpler, more powerful operating model
Most technology investments shift cost from one place to another.
This is one of the rare opportunities to remove cost entirely.
The Future Operating Model for Risk and Resilience
CIOs and CROs who are preparing for the next decade are not looking for another tool. They are looking for a way to simplify, automate, and elevate their programs so they can respond to risk with speed and precision.
They want continuous insight, not periodic reports. Connected data, not scattered data. Automation, not administration. Real-time resilience, not reactive effort.
CLDigital enables that shift by reducing complexity at the foundation instead of layering new tools on top.
This is a reinvention of how risk and resilience programs operate.
Connect with our team to learn more.
